FT Ok, what scopes do people use for FT?

Discussion in 'Hunter (HFT) & Field Target (FT)' started by RobF, May 6, 2010.

  1. NeilM

    NeilM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2015
    Messages:
    1,519
    Location:
    Nth Somerset
    Club:
    Mendip & Shebbear
    How do you find the Kahles in comparison to the Leupold's?
     
  2. C.Eaton

    C.Eaton Confirmed Anschutz Nut...

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,594
    Location:
    Hockley, UK
    Club:
    Springfield / TEGC
    Leupold Competition x40 with no.27 Premier reticle...and it's superb.
     
    DazF likes this.
  3. holly

    holly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,987
    Location:
    ISLE OF WIGHT
    Club:
    carisbrooke rangers
    They use Big Ones . no don't thank me ??? HOLLY
     
    Bill Fowler likes this.
  4. Steve Hebby

    Steve Hebby Beware the Chair

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Messages:
    488
    Location:
    Wakefield
    Club:
    Redfearn FTC
    Hi Neil,

    Optically the Leups (which are superb) compare very similar to the Kahles but the Kahles has a narrower field of view. Range finding wise I find the Kahles is more distinct (similar to the Sightrons & Nikko's). I also find the use of the range finding wheel being on top is no hassle in the sitting position and is much easier to use on the standers and kneelers.
     
    Dennis likes this.
  5. Lashy

    Lashy New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2
    Location:
    Wales
    Club:
    Blaenau Gwent
    I am using a Mtc Viper Pro 5-30 x50 Scope with 6" sidewheel
     
  6. kid

    kid New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    7
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    Club:
    Asenovgrad
    Nikko Diamond 10-50x60 Mk3 Mildot
     
    Steviek and Jost like this.
  7. nudge it just a little

    nudge it just a little Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Messages:
    65
    Location:
    glasgow
    Club:
    Bedlay
    Nightforce fixed 36 mag
    Parallaxes down to 8yds
    Front focus but snaps in and out
     
  8. spiderman

    spiderman New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2017
    Messages:
    9
    Location:
    Magherafelt, N.Ireland
    Club:
    Nomads FT club
    Nick Jenkins premier boosted 20-50 leupold. 1/4" Mil dot ret spaced 4" @ 100yrds
     
    DazF likes this.
  9. Joseph Stakun

    Joseph Stakun New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2018
    Messages:
    5
    Location:
    Florida
    Club:
    Dade City R&G club
    Hawke Sidewinder 30, 6-24X56, 20X 1/2 mildot reticle, sidewheel,
     
  10. hristoss

    hristoss New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2018
    Messages:
    8
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    Club:
    Field Target Bulgaria
    Falcon MT50 10-50x60 Field Target
     
  11. Tony shotton

    Tony shotton pablo ft

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2018
    Messages:
    11
    Location:
    Walsall wood,West Midlands
    Club:
    Blackbrook FTC
    ib use the s&b ft2 its lovely glass but at a cost
     
  12. holly

    holly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,987
    Location:
    ISLE OF WIGHT
    Club:
    carisbrooke rangers
    Leupold 14 to 35 by 40 . premier ret . with 50 foot adapter .

    Talking of FT scopes . i had my first look through a 80 mag march today . i was shocked to find what i thought would be super bright image on 40 mag . was actually about the same as a sightron . ??? HOLLY
     
    nemesis likes this.
  13. Darron

    Darron Dwarf Slayer

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2015
    Messages:
    1,359
    Location:
    Aldridge West Midlands
    Club:
    Blackbrook FTC
    Either a faulty March or more likely faulty eyes. You can’t compare March to Sightron glass.
     
    steve1000 likes this.
  14. holly

    holly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,987
    Location:
    ISLE OF WIGHT
    Club:
    carisbrooke rangers
    This was a brand new March 80 . silver . illum ret . on 40 mag on a gloomy ish target . defenition and image were world class . brightness was not . bazza tried it after me and he said the same ( Sightron user ) Paul ( really nice chap ) said that yes he does have problems on really dark targets . he also said that the 5=50 by 56 . 34 mil tube march he has , was a better , brighter scope Darron . Let's face it Darron , you bought the wrong one you old Tart . you will just have to suck it up . ain't life a bitch .

    Signed a confirmed 20=50 user . who is not selling his . Yehawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww HOLLY
     
  15. RobF

    RobF Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Messages:
    12,976
    Location:
    New Forest, Hampshire
    Club:
    Parkstone Gun Club, South Dorset FTC, Southampton Buccaneers
    The Sightron should be brighter on 40x than a March 8-80 set to 40x because the Sightron has a 60mm objective and the March a 56mm. That's the reason the 8-80 is brighter than a 10-60x52 because the 52 has a 52mm objective.


    60mm area is 28.27 cm2

    13.7% difference in area between that and this one below

    56mm area is 24.63 cm2

    14.7% difference in area between that and this one below

    52mm area is 21.24 cm2


    There's 29.39% difference between the 60mm's area and the 52mm's area.


    That's the only thing that makes a difference to light gathering (assuming the lenses are roughly equal in amount and quality)... the tube size makes no difference whatsoever, it's there just to provide more dialing range. This is easily demonstrated by the fact that some tubes are thicker than others despite the outside being the same.
     
    Tel and Darron like this.
  16. holly

    holly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,987
    Location:
    ISLE OF WIGHT
    Club:
    carisbrooke rangers
    OK Rob , then how do you account for my lupe being brighter than a 56 mil lens . being only 50 mil ? on the same mag . to be fair the lupe is not as snappy as either of those two scopes . ? HOLLY

    PS But then of course , when was i ever fair .
     
  17. RobF

    RobF Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Messages:
    12,976
    Location:
    New Forest, Hampshire
    Club:
    Parkstone Gun Club, South Dorset FTC, Southampton Buccaneers
    There's several reasons.

    First, did you measure it, or do you just think it is?

    Secondly, magnification isn't always what is written on the side of a scope. I've got two Hakko's here, both same model, both 40x, one has definitely got a larger image and a narrower field of view than the other.

    Thirdly, magnification is a number that is derived from other aspects of the lenses. And they can affect how wide the field of view is, and the depth of focus. And that will affect light gather. I use mag as a simple laymans term because it's easy for most to follow, rather than focal length which is very rarely published and some manufacturers refuse to do so. You can get an inkling though by looking at the eye relief distance. Longer ones will be darker, less FOV, and snap better, as compared to the same size objective of shorter ones which will be brighter, have wider FOV and snap not so well. As ever it's possible to buck the trend, but it's doubtful your 50mm leup, if it is 50x will be brighter than a 60mm on 50x. One can always measure it with a light meter though and prove it one way or another.
     
    Yoeri_B and Tel like this.
  18. Tel

    Tel Active Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Messages:
    101
    Location:
    Berkshire
    I'd agree the 8x80 isn't the brightest, but the quality of the image makes it so easy to range, and it snaps so clearly, I shot the same course as holly at the weekend, never questioned the ranging ability, never struggled with the conditions.

    It even ranges spot on at bisley in the eve with the floods on..
    It's been a pleasure to use since I've had it tbh.
     
    steve1000 likes this.
  19. holly

    holly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,987
    Location:
    ISLE OF WIGHT
    Club:
    carisbrooke rangers
    Hi Up Rob . yes John harris is always banging on about 20=50 mag not being 50 . i accept that some may not be . but i cannot see how all of em can be less . i don't know how they work this out . i have always found that the 20=50 was one of the brightest scopes . only one i had that was brighter was the first S&B FT . but as we know that did not turn out well . HOLLY
     
  20. Graham freeman

    Graham freeman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2014
    Messages:
    130
    Location:
    East Sussex



    hi T36 old glass version £900 new version £500
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice