1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Following Baz's Statement

Discussion in 'General Airgun Chat' started by clubshot, Jun 22, 2009.

  1. clubshot

    clubshot Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2008
    Messages:
    446
    Location:
    North London - UK
    Partly aware of Reasons that AMTA Kept Quite about AT

    In efforts to keep Air Gunners Profile lower and not give the Antis further reasons
    to Attack Air Gun's

    But as it Stands they are currently Asking Air Gunners to Buy a product / a Air Gun
    Which manufactures have Factory Set the power
    Which could still exceed the Sub 12FP Rule
    And risk the many problems of owning a Section 1 - Air Gun without a Licence

    Where No proof has been supplied that it was a problem
    Which could have resulted in the Need for New Laws / Restrictions

    There already is enough Laws / Offence Codes to cover idiots who wish to operate Air Gun's
    which Exceed the Sub 12FP rule without a Section 1 License

    But the most Annoying Statement - is that Because We do not accept
    AMAT's word, that what they are doing is Best for Air Gunners
    That We are threatening Air Gunners -
    By possible inviting Further Legislation / Restrictions Against Air Gunners

    Where it is well document - that this Government is unable to
    Control anyone within it's already packed Legal System

    BOB/R
     
  2. GMF

    GMF Non member

    eerr who or wot is AMTA :confused:

    Glynn
     
  3. Sam Vimes

    Sam Vimes New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    186
    Location:
    Richmond or the Yorkshire Wolds
    Airgun Manufacturers Trade Association.
     
  4. GMF

    GMF Non member

    Cheers Chris ;) :rolleyes: :D

    Glynn
     

Share This Page